First Person PR

A firsthand account of communications’ evolving role in branding

What NOT to say to reporters

The folks over at The Bad Pitch Blog issued a call for the top things PR people should never say to reporters. People got creative in the comments and on Facebook, and Kevin and Richard posted a PDF with their top 10 picks. Yours truly even made the list with my suggestions (and got a little AdAge fame):

  • Sorry, we’re only briefing top tier media on this news.
  • We’ll give you a local exclusive on this. The WSJ is doing a piece, but we don’t view you as competitive.
  • Since you didn’t cover us after our last meeting, you really owe us a story.
  • I saw an interesting piece on CNET and thought you’d be interested in doing a similar story.
  • No executive is available to talk about this. But it’s big news, trust me.

Check it out and make sure you add the blog to your RSS feed (seriously, it’s one of my favorite blogs — some of the pitches they post are like watching a face lift on TLC. I cringe, but I’m horrified and entertained at the same time).

And make sure you let us know if you have more suggestions to add … maybe it’ll turn into a top 50 list soon!

A few more (serious) things your agency wants you to know

As follow on to my last post, here’s a great blog entry by Rohit Bhargava called, “7 Lessons On How To Be a Great Client.” It provides great advice for clients looking to build lasting relationships with PR/marketing/communications agencies.

Read Rohit’s piece for more details, but his seven key pieces of advice are:

  1. Provide clear direction
  2. Invite us to the table early
  3. Be honest about success factors
  4. Take the advice you are paying for
  5. Know what you don’t know
  6. Understand that changes affect timelines
  7. Ask our advice

Have any others you’d like to add?

5 things your agency won’t tell you … but really wants to

1. Don’t be a jackass. You laugh, but I’ll wager that every agency person has worked with an abusive client at one point. Maybe it’s a VP of marketing who used to have a $15 million budget and ran PR for a F100 company who doesn’t understand why their $50k annual budget doesn’t get the same jumping-at-the-sound-of-their-voice reaction. Or maybe it’s a new CMO that thinks business reporters should jump at the chance to cover a startup with no customers, no shipping product, no real strategy, and no known investors. Or, perhaps that day-to-day contact is just over whelmed and can’t do everything being asked of her.Regardless of the reasons why, there’s never an excuse to be an ass to your team. I promise, yelling doesn’t make them work harder and won’t make them respect you. And going over the manager’s head every other day doesn’t build a strong relationship.

This doesn’t mean that you can’t or shouldn’t expect a lot from your team. My top three favorite clients are also the most demanding clients I ever worked for. They respected me and I respected them … I’d go out of my way to help them and my team made sure they looked good internally.

2. Your 18 I-know-this-isn’t-PR-related-but-can-you-deal-with-it-anyway requests ate the budget. Especially with startups, agencies are often asked to fill in on projects, write webinar media alerts, track down reprint costs, etc. when the internal staff is overworked or non-existent. Unless you’re in a super hot company in a very popular industry, not focusing on media relations will always result in less coverage. Asking a team to jump on these minor tasks is understandable (if temporary), but if this is your situation, you need to accept there will tradeoffs and these “easy” projects can tend to be time consuming. If your priority is coverage and results, make sure you’re not the agency’s biggest obstacle.

3. That’s a dumb idea. I’m sorry, but sometimes it just is.

4. You’re not the only client. And 10 p.m. isn’t business hours. Oh, and my private cell phone … is private (okay, that might be three things). Think that contradicts client service? I don’t. I believe if a client/agency relationship is mutually respectful, the client needs to understand that parameters exist. I think I was a rare bird in the agency because I actually told my clients that one, I turned my cell phone off as soon as I entered the office building (my mom didn’t like that rule either); two, I couldn’t promise I’d answer a call or email in the evening unless I was expecting it; and three, if I didn’t pick up a page, I was probably on the phone with another client. Having a client email me, IM me, call my cell and call my office all in a matter of 30 seconds was too much for me, and ended up distracting me and creating an unnecessary level of anxiety. So at one point, I finally stopped it. I was always diplomatic in how I explained it to my clients, but I was honest and upfront about where my work/personal boundaries were.

I get that the core of agency service is client service. But unless you’re Microsoft, your agency most likely has more than one client. Especially when you’re working on more than one client, and with all the distractions that technology provides, agency people need to be able to focus when they can. That’s why your agency provides a team … if one person is unreachable, chances are you’ll find someone else (And I guarantee if your panic attack is related to a syringe being found in your product, even the most junior person on the team will know enough to find a senior person pronto).

Side note to all you agency readers and minor rant coming: To me, there is nothing more annoying and disrespectful than scheduling a team meeting only to make the junior staff wait while you talk on your cell phone, thinking your time is more valuable than theirs. Likewise, your clients are people, too, and if you work with them to meet all the deadlines during the day (which means sending that release at 4, not 8), then there’s no need for evening calls. You’ll never convince me it’s necessary for a client to call you at 9 p.m. to talk about a pitch going out two weeks later, or for you to call your client on Friday night to talk about an award due the following Wednesday. If I send my agency an email at 10 at night, it’s because I’m catching up. I don’t expect a reply until the next day :)

5. All that coverage doesn’t just happen. There always comes a point when a client starts thinking they’re all that, makes an agency switch for some random reason (less money, they can do more for less, etc.), and then the coverage disappears. I actually had a client that we took from 60 pieces of coverage to 500 and then almost 1,000 in two years (and they were high quality, on message) … then hubris kicked in, they made a switch, and went down to about 12 pieces of coverage the following six months. Yes, it happens that quickly. No, reporters don’t just “call” PR people to talk to you. When you start thinking that securing those massive amounts of coverage is like shooting fish in a barrel, it’s time for a reality check. It has more to do with your PR team kicking ass and maintaining key relationships than you think.

Wow. I feel better now … some of those have been bottled up for a few years.

Some thoughts from ad:tech

This week’s ad:tech was insane … my feet are still sore. Unfortunately, I didn’t get to sit in on a lot of sessions, but I did hit a few and got some great nuggets that relate to PR/communications:

  • I think I might want to (eventually) work for a consumer company. With lots of money. Several All of the coolest social media case studies I heard came from consumer companies.
  • The “holy grail” of social media — whether it be social networks, blogs, video, etc. — is to move from B2B marketing/communications to C2C communications, where your brand advocates are carrying the message. This theme popped up a few times, and one attendee commented that using the “C2C” description to his execs resonated more quickly than social media did (who doesn’t love a good acronym, right?).
  • One panelist from Fox Interactive Media talked about the “momentum effect” of social media. Here are two articles talking about the study back in April. They’re geared toward consumers and advertising, but it includes some great stats that could be helpful selling social media internally.
  • Content continues to be king. But in the world of social media and consumer generated content (read: content overload) it needs to be more than simply relevant and interesting — it needs to add value to the community.
  • Authenticity, authenticity, authenticity.
  • And finally, don’t engage a community and then abandon them (I feel like I’ve broken this rule lately).

And now, I’m off to soak the feet :)

Heading to ad:tech next week

It’s been an insane month (and seriously, is it really November already)? I’ll be back on board with new posts soon.

In the meantime, I’m heading to NYC next Sunday through Wednesday for ad:tech. Would love to meet with anyone who’s going … drop me a line at kari [underscore] hanson2003 [at] yahoo

A tiny social media backfire …

Everyone’s focused on the Facebook/Microsoft investment news. It’s been a topic in the rumor mill for several weeks, so it’s really not that shocking anymore. I’ve been watching the rumors and the news closely, though, because on the PR front, we all knew that at some point before the official announcement, the rumor would be inadvertently confirmed (it always happens with news that big). The questions we were all asking were when and how.

A few news sites confirmed the rumor with “un-named” sources, but did anyone see ValleyWag’s confirmation post? They happened to notice that key PR contacts at both companies had friended each other on Facebook. Clearly, ValleyWag made a (not so) huge leap of faith, but as we embrace more social technologies, this is something for us all to keep in mind: the scoop oriented media (read: bloggers) may be watching the company you keep.

Transparency vs. authenticity … does one trump the other?

Rohit Bhargava recently posted a presentation he gave about marketing in a Web 2.0 world that got me to thinking about transparency and authenticity.Let’s face it – transparency is one of the most used social media buzzwords (perhaps not too far behind conversation, blogosphere and, well, social media). It’s also a word that is both easily defined yet hard to grasp. I find this especially true when we talk about companies becoming more transparent in their communications, particularly when trying to balance the needs of the company with the requests of the online world.

Rohit’s presentation resonated with me because I agree – it’s not necessarily about transparency in communications, it’s about authenticity – in everything you we do.

If you accept that businesses are around to make money, you must also accept that there will, necessarily, be limitations on how open a company can/should be. That means that sometimes, this “transparency” isn’t always the right choice for companies – particularly when discussing future plans of the company.

However, I believe it is very possible for executives to be authentic while still maintaining a competitive edge and protecting proprietary information. In the end, it’s all about adding a lot more “human factor” and removing the corporate speak — which ultimately helps build trusting relationships with employees, shareholders, customers and partners, and even the media. All this is done by simply allowing a spokesperson to be honest and forthcoming (without disclosing company secrets).

Calling all contributors: Corporate vs. Agency

A post I wrote a few months ago, Corporate vs. Agency: An Inside Out View continues to be one of the top posts on First Person PR. Based on the comments and emails related to that post, it’s clearly a topic many of you are interested in, so I thought I’d revisit it.

I have a second post ready with even more similarities and differences between the two PR camps. But before I publish it, I wanted to issue a call for contributions so I can your observations to it. So, for those of you who started on one side and move to the other, I’d love to your thoughts on the main differences (and similarities) you’ve found between the two.

Either leave your submission as a comment to this post, or email it to me at kari [underscore] hanson2003 [at] yahoo [dot] com, and I’ll merge them into a single list.

Blurring boundaries …

Looking for proof that we’re all still trying to find our way in the blogosphere? Check out a recent gaf by a PR newbie pretending to be someone else. Todd uses the event as a reason to remind PR agencies that to err is expected, but to publicly acknowledge mistakes is demanded in this social media world. And to their credit, Racepoint uses it to educate others.

To me, the most interesting take away from this online discussion is a reminder that as PR evolves, it leaves a bumpy road for agencies. We all understand (well, we’re starting to understand) the boundaries of PR engaging with the blogosphere. Open, honest, etc. But as far as PR agencies go, I think we’re only beginning to agree on where the boundaries are. As blogs become more mainstream, more and more PR people will be required to build relationships with bloggers. Already, agencies are starting to promote relationships with bloggers as prominently as relationships with the media and analysts.

But, here’s the catch: Traditionally, PR agencies took great strides to NOT act as company spokespeople (I remember a few times I was cited in stories, and I’ll tell you my clients weren’t happy). The rules of engagement have changed, though, and many bloggers prefer public comments over private emails. At what point is it okay for an agency PR rep to respond? Is it considered on a client-by-client basis?

AND, when the PR rep isn’t pushing a client agenda, does it make sense for them to post comments on blogs? I think so, but I was also on the agency side and I’ll admit, having junior staff publicly exposed like that scared the hell out of me. Yet, to only have senior folks comment kills the relationship building. I certainly don’t think it can be a free for all, with PR people openly commenting on blogs to promote their clients. I’m also not convinced that encouraging a PR person to post comments related to their clients is really how to go about building a relationship in the first place (I actually think that’s exactly what not to do, but others disagree).

At the same time, I wonder if it makes sense for agencies to begin developing content experts who can engage industry bloggers in thoughtful debate, publicly? Or is that counter productive to thought leadership campaigns with their clients? And at what point, as an agency, do you open your most junior staff up to public scrutiny, and where do you shield them? I don’t have a solution to offer here, and my gut tells me a lot of agencies are grappling with these very topics internally. I’m sure their clients also have opinions (probably 30 of them), which complicates the topic even more. And then, of course, the bloggers (both independent and media) probably have another set of opinions. It would be a facisnating round table discussion, that’s for sure! What about you? Where do you think the boundary is (or should be)?

(Take 2) A little housekeeping …

Update: I was just made aware of another glitch (I’m still a blogging newbie). Apparently several of your comments have been going into my spam bucket, which I haven’t been monitoring. I’m sorry to those who think I’ve been ignoring them … I’ll be more diligent about checking that from now on :)

Apparently, my RSS doohickey button hasn’t been working, and some existing subscribers have been having problems as well. Thanks to FeedBurner, I *think* I’ve fixed the problem.

To subscribe to my blog’s feed, please click here (my technical helpers suggest that you may want to re-subscribe using this feed).

Thanks — and sorry for the problems.

~Kari

  • Obligatory Disclaimer

    This blog expresses my personal opinions. I try to reference what I’m doing in my current role, but in no way does this blog represent opinions of anyone but myself.