<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>First Person PR &#187; Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstpersonpr.com/category/social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstpersonpr.com</link>
	<description>A firsthand account of communications' evolving role in branding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:30:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Add &#8216;Personality Not Included&#8217; to Your Reading List!</title>
		<link>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2010/01/25/personality-not-included-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2010/01/25/personality-not-included-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personality Not Included]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstpersonpr.com/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the biggest perk to commuting from Boston to Austin is the time on the airplane between when my laptop battery dies and we land that I use  to catch up on reading. I lost my appetite for the “PR is dying,” the “social media will save PR/marketing,” and the “I have so many followers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the biggest perk to commuting from Boston to Austin is the time on the airplane between when my laptop battery dies and we land that I use  to catch up on reading. I lost my appetite for the “PR is dying,” the “social media will save PR/marketing,” and the “I have so many followers on Twitter that I’m now an expert” books – primarily because it’s not, it won’t, and you’re not. For the last year or so I’ve been consuming as many branding books as possible, particularly ones that dissect the science behind branding. Many were repeats of my marketing text books from college, but a few stand out.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-216  aligncenter" title="PNI" src="http://www.firstpersonpr.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/PNI1-150x150.jpg" alt="PNI" width="126" height="126" /></p>
<p>First up is <a href="http://www.personalitynotincluded.com" target="_self">Personality Not Included</a>: Why Companies Lose Their Authenticity – And How Great Brands Get it Back by Rohit Bhargava (you know him from his <a href="http://rohitbhargava.typepad.com/" target="_self">Influential Marketing</a> blog). If you want to judge a book by its cover, the rocking rooster delivers! The book was an easy read and I found myself reading the first several chapters a second time with a highlighter in hand. I loved the book because it delves into branding from a communications perspective:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Personality is not just about what you stand for, but how you choose to communicate it … This is the social media era, where all forms of media are portable, personal, and filtered – where brands have fewer secrets and have their identities shaped by perception as much as communication.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>He also spends a lot of time at the fallacy of only using approved spokespeople:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Perhaps no other trend in the marketing and communications processes of companies has been more instrumental in the loss of the personality of organizations than the &#8220;employee silencing policy&#8221; … employees are already your brand spokesperson to a degree.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m sure PR pros are going to panic when they start reading that section. But it’s less about using the proper spokespeople in PR campaigns and more about embracing individuals in the right settings. If you look around your company, you probably already know people who blog, are tradeshow rock stars, etc. Rohit refers to that person as an “accidental spokesperson,” and I believe there’s value in leveraging their passion – for the company and the employee. A few snippets from that section:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;You are not giving up control, but sharing it … The true power of an accidental spokesperson come from him or her having natural authenticity … This is not about ownership. Embracing them means giving them the content, attention, and access they need to tell a compelling story.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>My only complaint is that wish the book was a paperback &#8212; because they fit in my laptop case better. But if you’re looking for a good read on your next flight, I suggest you pick this one up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2010/01/25/personality-not-included-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips &amp; Tricks for your Corporate Social Media Efforts</title>
		<link>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2009/08/03/socialmediatricks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2009/08/03/socialmediatricks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MarketingProf's B2B Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random PR Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstpersonpr.com/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
As I wrote last week&#8217;s post on the MarketingProfs&#8217; B2B Forum, one particular session stood out to me &#8211; it was insanely interesting, interactive and valuable. Hosted by Jason Baer (of Convince and Convert fame), the session entailed three actual attendees letting the audience evaluate, analyze and critique their B2B social media efforts &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>As I wrote last week&#8217;s <a href="http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2009/07/30/marketingprofsb2bforum/">post</a> on the <a href="http://www.marketingprofs.com/" target="_blank">MarketingProfs&#8217; B2B Forum</a>, one particular session stood out to me &#8211; it was insanely interesting, interactive and valuable. Hosted by <a href="http://www.twitter.com/jaybaer" target="_blank">Jason Baer</a> (of <a href="http://www.convinceandconvert.com/" target="_blank">Convince and Convert</a> fame), the session entailed three actual attendees letting the audience evaluate, analyze and critique their B2B social media efforts &#8211; whether it be a corporate blog, a community forum, Twitter, etc. or a combination.</p>
<p>Jason started the session off with an incredibly brief appeal to all B2B marketers to  define what success is, and know your strategy on social media. As he explained, too often the tactics are executed before a company knows what their objective is because someone wants to try Twitter, another wants to add a LinkedIn Group, etc. Even if you&#8217;ve been using various social media technologies, he suggested taking a step back to regroup and define the ultimate goal &#8211; which then lends itself to measurement and metrics (a major theme of the event).</p>
<p>He also emphasized that social media is not for features and benefits content. It&#8217;s to TELL A STORY and add personality (however relaxed or professional) to a brand. The companies most successful with social media have an end goal in mind and aren&#8217;t trying to feed data sheets into social networks and on blogs. That&#8217;s true for B2B and B2C companies.</p>
<p>I loved this session for many reasons. Mostly, I loved that it took three of my peers &#8211; who admittedly did not have the marketing resources (staff or budget) that a Fortune 500 company had &#8211; and provided them (and us) with specific, and realistic, suggestions to improve. The majority of them centered around the idea that regardless of whether you &#8220;own&#8221; all the properties, you need to connect the dots (between your company&#8217;s LinkedIn, Twitter, blog, website, etc). When done properly, that can extend each other&#8217;s audience and create a cumulative effect. When done poorly, they create an annoying echo chamber that is perceived as corporate spam.</p>
<p>Below are the very tactical, but incredibly valuable, tips/suggestions that I left the session with:</p>
<ul class="unIndentedList">
<li> Every presentation (or podcast or webinar or whitepaper) your company produces can potentially fuel 5-6 blog posts. Make heavy use of content already being created, but keep in mind that the features/function language needs to be pulled out.</li>
<li> If you have a group contributed blog, include pictures of the authors by each post.</li>
<li> On your corporate blog, add links to each exec&#8217;s <a href="http://www.linkedin.com">LinkedIn</a> profile. Also be sure to add their profiles in your company&#8217;s LinkedIn Group page. (Check out this great article by Jason, &#8220;<a href="http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-marketing/linkedin-22-ways-to-dominate/" target="_blank">22 Ways to Dominate LinkedIn</a>,&#8221; for more tips.)</li>
<li> Use tools to extend your audience beyond the &#8220;people in the room&#8221; (beyond your blog subscribers, LinkedIn Group members, webinar/tradeshow attendees, etc.):</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<ol>
<li>Use <a href="http://slideshare.net/" target="_blank">slideshare.net</a> to share presentation-based content and then embed in your corporate blog. LinkedIn also has a slideshare app to pull the slides into profiles of execs and the group page. This is a perfect way to extend the reach of tradeshow and webinar presentations.</li>
<li>Check out <a href="http://www.scribd.com/">Scribd.com</a>, which is like a &#8220;slideshare for documents.&#8221; It allows you to embed the cover page of each whitepaper to be downloaded into your blog, and again extends the audience.</li>
<li>Make use of tools to incorporate your blog content into LinkedIn profiles (LinkedIn has a blog app that can automate this, too).</li>
<li>If you use need to use the whitepapers and webinars as lead generators, just wait a few months before sharing them &#8211; and then extend their life and reach.</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<ul class="unIndentedList">
<li> Don&#8217;t use your corporate <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a> feed as a &#8220;link dump.&#8221; And if you&#8217;re using an automated tool to feed your Twitter, <a href="http://friendfeed.com/">FriendFeed</a>, etc., make sure you&#8217;re not spamming the same updates multiple times. Also, recognize that people may be following your brand and multiple employees on Twitter, so be careful that you&#8217;re not creating your own &#8220;retweeting&#8221; echo chamber.</li>
<li> If you manage a corporate Twitter account, take 15 minutes to brand the background with links to the company&#8217;s website.</li>
<li> If multiple people are involved in the corporate Twitter account, take a look at <a href="http://cotweet.com/">Cotweet</a> and <a href="http://hootsuite.com/">Hootsuite</a>. They both allow multiple contributors to a single account, and allows staged tweets (here&#8217;s a <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10262407-2.html">CNET comparison</a> of both).</li>
<li>Sign up for a <a href="http://bit.ly/">bit.ly</a> account to provide shortened URLs across all platforms. It allows you to track/measure how many people followed the link.</li>
</ul>
<p>The event was great, but this session really made it worthwhile for me. I hope you find the suggestions as helpful as I did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2009/08/03/socialmediatricks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My [belated] Top 10 Take Aways from MarketingProfs&#8217; B2B Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2009/07/30/marketingprofsb2bforum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2009/07/30/marketingprofsb2bforum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MarketingProf's B2B Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR and recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstpersonpr.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this summer, I attended the MarketingProfs&#8217; BtoB Forum in Boston and had every intention of posting my thoughts the following week. In a nice (for me) twist, I came away with so many ideas and to dos that I focused on incorporating them into my existing program and quickly forgot about writing a blog [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this summer, I attended the <a href="http://www.marketingprofs.com/" target="_blank">MarketingProfs&#8217; BtoB Forum</a> in Boston and had every intention of posting my thoughts the following week. In a nice (for me) twist, I came away with so many ideas and to dos that I focused on incorporating them into my existing program and quickly forgot about writing a blog post.</p>
<p>But now I&#8217;m finally getting around to sharing the key themes that resonated with me from sessions on social media, marketing in a recession and measurement. Each session built on one another, and as a result my notes felt more like a Twitter stream than the linear notes I usually take. Subsequently, I wasn&#8217;t able to directly attribute each piece of marketing wisdom to a speaker. However, at the end I have provided links to all the sessions and speakers I attended &#8212; and definitely recommend you check them out.</p>
<p>Without further ado, here&#8217;s my Top 10 list from the event (in no particular order):</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Perspective matters.</strong> I&#8217;ve attended events focused on &#8220;just&#8221; communications/PR and always found them to be preaching to the choir. While the event had its fair share of preaching to the choir, there were enough marketing and B2B buyer perspectives represented that added a ton of value. Too often, communications silos itself from marketing and loses sight of the larger, collective goal.</li>
<li><strong>There is still a battle over control when it comes to social media.</strong> A lot of questions during the sessions highlighted a fear of losing control of the messaging from marketing departments. At the same time, a lot of responses from self-described social media experts took the tone of &#8220;the point of Twitter is &#8230;&#8221; I think they&#8217;re trying hard too to dictate the usage the tools when the reality is that the usage depends on the goal &#8211; and (gasp) not every campaign is designed to engage directly with a customer.</li>
<li><strong>Use social media <span style="text-decoration: underline;">tools</span> to complement existing marketing/comms/PR <span style="text-decoration: underline;">campaigns</span>. </strong>As Sandy Carter of IBM said, &#8220;we don&#8217;t have a social media strategy, we have a marketing strategy.&#8221; Look at social media tools as new mediums to execute against your strategy. For example: include a link to the blog in banner ads; use Twitter to drive booth traffic; supplement a whitepaper with podcasts, etc.</li>
<li><strong>If you pay attention, social media gives you valuable insight.</strong> With today&#8217;s information overload, everyone agrees that customers and influencers are more savvy and more skeptical &#8211; and they can easily detect marketing &#8220;hype.&#8221; Use videos and blogs and twitter and &lt;insert your customers&#8217; favorite medium&gt; to understand how they want to be marketed to. Listen to the words they use and update your messaging accordingly.</li>
<li><strong>2009 is about doing better with less.</strong> As measurement maven Katie Paine told us, &#8220;Measuring isn&#8217;t always about proving value, it&#8217;s about knowing what&#8217;s working and what&#8217;s not.&#8221; Forrester&#8217;s Laura Ramos added in one session, &#8220;Without understanding your strategy and having measurable goals, social media can easily become &#8216;purpose-less&#8217; activity.&#8221; A quote from Peter Drucker summed it up: &#8220;Efficiency is doing things right; effectiveness is doing the right things.&#8221; Focus on using measurement to see what works and then dial up/down your mix accordingly (listen, learn and change).</li>
<li><strong>Stay true to your company&#8217;s goals. </strong>Define upfront what success is and how you&#8217;ll measure your efforts, including your social media tactics. And don&#8217;t confuse popularity with influence. Target your efforts. It&#8217;s not necessarily about getting thousands of followers on Twitter, it&#8217;s about connecting with people who ultimately influence your sales cycle. Particularly in communications, popularity metrics are an easy out when we don&#8217;t have &#8220;real&#8221; results to report on.</li>
<li><strong>Recognize that social media is different.</strong> You can&#8217;t take traditional content and just &#8220;plug&#8221; it into social media and be successful. Most presenters also agreed that social media is hard in B2B because you have to find where <span style="text-decoration: underline;">your</span> customers are, and how (or even <em>if</em>) they want to be engaged.</li>
<li><strong>Remember your audience is not necessarily your peers.</strong> In several sessions, questions were asked about LinkedIn versus Facebook for marketing efforts. The consensus &#8211; from an audience of marketers &#8211; was that Facebook had more users and was more fun and was therefore better. But over and over, presenters from B2B companies reminded us that our goal isn&#8217;t to get in front of marketers, and many B2B buyers don&#8217;t want to be sold to on Facebook. In fact, IBM actually surveyed its SOA customers and found out, hands down, that they preferred to hear about vendors on LinkedIn. They don&#8217;t necessarily <em>post and interact</em> with vendors there, but they do join groups and read the Q&amp;As to get informed.</li>
<li><strong>Counting is not ROI.</strong> Move your metrics framework from the very tactical to being strategic. That&#8217;s how to impress the c-suite, but it requires that you can speak in business terms (and if you can&#8217;t, focus more on learning about business than social media). Measure business outcomes (market share, share of voice, adoption rate, etc.) not your tactical activity (coverage numbers, leads, downloads, etc.). Realize this means siloed metrics need to feed into broader measurement reports.</li>
<li><strong>Don&#8217;t be afraid to &#8220;fail&#8221; once or twice.</strong> Time Magazine&#8217;s Steve Johnson told us, &#8220;Right now, there&#8217;s a tolerance of failure [in social media] that we should embrace. Experiment and innovate now.&#8221;</li>
</ol>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Overall, it was great event &#8211; one I&#8217;d love to attend next year. As promised, here are links to the presentations I listened to, as well as the speakers&#8217; blogs and Twitter feeds:</p>
<ul class="unIndentedList">
<li> All the handouts are available at <a href="http://www.marketingprofs.com/events/7/handouts/?adref=ematt528" target="_blank">http://www.marketingprofs.com/events/7/handouts/?adref=ematt528</a></li>
<li> <strong><a href="http://www.marketingprofs.com/events/files/HANDOUTS/B2BF09_SocialMediaMarketingMix.pdf" target="_blank">Marketing 2.0: Integrating Social Media into Your Marketing Mix</a></strong> with Sandy Carter of IBM (<a href="http://socialmediasandy.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">blog</a>, <a href="http://www.twitter.com/sandy_carter" target="_blank">@sandy_carter</a>)</li>
<li> <strong><a href="http://www.marketingprofs.com/events/files/HANDOUTS/B2BF09_EconomicImpact.pdf" target="_blank">2009 Economic Impact on B2B Marketing Budgets &amp; Practices</a></strong> with Carter; Laura Ramos of Forrester (<a href="http://b2bmarketingpost.com/" target="_blank">blog</a>, <a href="http://www.twitter.com/lauraramos" target="_blank">@lauraramos</a>); Roy Young of MarketingProfs (<a href="http://www.twitter.com/royprofs" target="_blank">@RoyProfs</a>)</li>
<li> <strong>Day 1 Keynote</strong> with Steven Johnson of Time (<a href="http://www.stevenberlinjohnson.com/" target="_blank">blog</a>, <a href="http://www.twitter.com/stevenbjohnson" target="_blank">@stevenbjohnson</a>)</li>
<li> <strong><a href="http://www.marketingprofs.com/events/files/HANDOUTS/B2BF09_MakingEveryInvestmentCount.pdf" target="_blank">Make Every Investment Count: The Measure of Marketing</a></strong> with Laura Patterson of VisionEdge Marketing (<a href="http://www.twitter.com/lauravem" target="_blank">@LauraVEM</a>)</li>
<li> <strong>Social Media Hot Seat</strong> with Jason Baer of Convince &amp; Convert (<a href="http://www.convinceandconvert.com/" target="_blank">blog</a>, <a href="http://www.twitter.com/jaybaer" target="_blank">@jaybaer</a>)</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.marketingprofs.com/events/files/HANDOUTS/B2BF09_MeasuringValueSocialMedia.pdf" target="_blank">Tales from the Trenches: How Organizations are Measuring Value in Social Media</a></strong> with Katie Paine of KDPaine &amp; Partners (<a href="http://kdpaine.blogs.com/" target="_blank">blog</a>, <a href="http://www.twitter.com/kdpaine" target="_blank">@KDPaine</a>)</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2009/07/30/marketingprofsb2bforum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spring cleaning brings spring reading</title>
		<link>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2008/03/31/spring-cleaning-brings-spring-reading/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2008/03/31/spring-cleaning-brings-spring-reading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FirstPersonPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstpersonpr.wordpress.com/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know, I know &#8212; I&#8217;ve been horrible about blogging. I&#8217;ve been going through the yearly planning, yearly wrap up and yearly over justification process. It&#8217;s been painful, educational and enlightening all at the same time, and I have several posts floating around in my head from it. But I need to gain a little [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, I know &#8212; I&#8217;ve been horrible about blogging. I&#8217;ve been going through the yearly planning, yearly wrap up and yearly over justification process. It&#8217;s been painful, educational and enlightening all at the same time, and I have several posts floating around in my head from it. But I need to gain a little perspective before ranting and raving.</p>
<p>In the meantime, I&#8217;ve been cleaning out my Bloglines clippings folder, and found a handful of posts worth sharing. I realize a few are several months old at this point, but I reread each one and they&#8217;re still great references and all-around-good-reads. So check them out.</p>
<ul>
<li><b>From Pandia Search Engine News: <a href="http://www.pandia.com/sew/591-rss08.html" target="_blank">The definitive top 5 online RSS reader</a> </b>&#8211; <i>a must read for those of you who aren&#8217;t using an RSS reader to stay up on news and blogs (and looking at my traffic stats, that&#8217;s a lot of you).</i></li>
<li><b>From Mashable: <a href="http://mashable.com/2007/11/07/google-reader-blogroll/" target="_blank">When a Blogroll Isn&#8217;t a Blogroll</a></b> &#8212; <i>a particularly compelling idea (I think) for agency folks.</i></li>
<li><b>From Liberate Media: <a href="http://www.liberatemedia.com/blog/social-media-tools-list-from-analytics-to-digg/" target="_blank">Social Media Tools List &#8211; From Analytics to Digg</a></b> &#8212; <i>a huge resource for all your social media questions.</i></li>
<li><b>From Jeremy Pepper: <a href="http://pop-pr.blogspot.com/2007/10/pr-will-lose-social-media-to.html" target="_blank">PR will lose Social Media to Advertising Because of Sex</a></b> &#8212; <i>great commentary on who should/will &#8220;own&#8221; social media.</i></li>
<li><b>From Chip Griffin: <a href="http://mediabullseye.com/mb/2007/12/throwing-out-the-social-media.html" target="_blank">Throwing Out the Social Media Rulebook</a></b> &#8212; <i>points out that not every &#8220;rule&#8221; in the emerging social media world should be followed, and why.<br />
</i></li>
<li><b>From Jeremiah Owyang: <a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/11/19/list-of-resources-profiles-indexes-blogs-and-information-for-the-analyst-industry/" target="_blank">List of Resources for the Analyst Industry</a></b> &#8212; <i>a list of several analyst-related social media resources.</i></li>
<li><b>Also from Jeremiah Owyang: </b><b><a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2008/01/01/a-complete-list-of-the-many-forms-of-web-marketing-for-2008/" target="_blank">A Complete List of the Many forms of Web Marketing in 2008</a></b> &#8212; <i>a great breakdown of the many forms of web marketing and the social media technologies related to each.</i></li>
<li><b>From Now Is Gone: <a href="http://nowisgone.com/2007/12/10/finding-savvy-social-media-consultants/" target="_blank">Finding Savvy Social Media Consultants</a></b> &#8212; <i>helpful suggestions for anyone looking to hire social media experts.</i></li>
<li><b>From Brian Solis: <a href="http://www.briansolis.com/2008/02/definitive-guide-to-social-media.html" target="_blank">The Definitive Guide to Social Media Releases</a></b> &#8212; <i>regardless of you think about the social media release, this post includes an interesting picture of what each press release wire offers.</i></li>
<li><b>From Kathy Kerchner: <a href="http://www.masteryourmessage.com/wordpress/?p=53" target="_blank">Bad Press Releases Feature Boring, Ridiculous Quotes</a></b> &#8212; <i>PR folks are notorious for overwriting press releases, but this provides great examples of what a release could be.</i></li>
<li><b>From Brendan Cooper: <a href="http://brendancooper.com/2008/02/24/the-pr-friendly-index-for-february-2008/" target="_blank">PR Friendly Index</a></b> &#8212; <i>a fabulous list of 100 PR focused blogs. Pick a new one each week to explore!</i></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2008/03/31/spring-cleaning-brings-spring-reading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Social Media technologies to watch</title>
		<link>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2008/03/10/5-social-media-technologies-to-watch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2008/03/10/5-social-media-technologies-to-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstpersonpr.wordpress.com/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Side note &#8212; clearly, I&#8217;m catching up on my reading :)
BtoB Magazine has a great piece in this week&#8217;s issue, &#8220;Introducing the Next Generation of Tech Marketing,&#8221; that&#8217;s worth the read. It talks about several social media tools and technologies that you may already be familiar with, as well as a few to start playing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Side note &#8212; clearly, I&#8217;m catching up on my reading :)</p>
<p>BtoB Magazine has a great piece in this week&#8217;s issue, &#8220;<a href="http://www.btobonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080310/FREE/286946018/1108/FREE" target="_blank">Introducing the Next Generation of Tech Marketing</a>,&#8221; that&#8217;s worth the read. It talks about several social media tools and technologies that you may already be familiar with, as well as a few to start playing around with: widgets (I love the Facebook app on the iPhone), social feeds, data portability, mashups and open mobile. Granted, some probably fall into the marketing camp, but they&#8217;re still worth looking at.</p>
<p>Also in this week&#8217;s issue is a <a href="http://www.btobonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080310/FREE/437270013/1108/FREE" target="_blank">short piece</a> on how large companies are embracing social media, like official Facebook groups. It&#8217;s not rocket science, but they&#8217;re good snippets to have in your back pocket in case any exec says &#8220;no one&#8217;s doing this.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2008/03/10/5-social-media-technologies-to-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marketwire saves (and kills) the press release</title>
		<link>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2008/02/04/marketwire-saves-and-kills-the-press-release/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2008/02/04/marketwire-saves-and-kills-the-press-release/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FirstPersonPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstpersonpr.wordpress.com/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s news that Marketwire has revolutionized the social media release caught my eye. In case you haven&#8217;t seen it, Marketwire is integrating social media components into their newswire.
However, I don&#8217;t think this &#8220;Social Media 2.0&#8243; is going to be the press release&#8217;s salvation, because it&#8217;s still plagued by bad, buzzword-laden writing. For example, take the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today&#8217;s <a href="http://www.easyir.com/easyir/prssrel.do?easyirid=D8C5511F9A45C612&amp;version=live&amp;prid=356601" target="_blank">news</a> that Marketwire has revolutionized the social media release caught my eye. In case you haven&#8217;t seen it, Marketwire is integrating social media components into their newswire.</p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t think this &#8220;Social Media 2.0&#8243; is going to be the press release&#8217;s salvation, because it&#8217;s still plagued by bad, buzzword-laden writing. For example, take the second sentence of the release, where I think Marketwire is trying to say something about distribution:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Social Media 2.0 advances today&#8217;s press release format, offers public relations professionals a multitude of content options, and <strong>distributes</strong> news in a variety of mediums to <strong>distribution</strong> channels beyond traditional media <strong>distribution</strong> networks.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I also think there&#8217;s some subtle irony to a social media release &#8212; designed to reach online users who frequently embed links in their text and know to click on a hyperlink &#8212; using the phrase &#8220;click here&#8221; so many times (Perhaps last night&#8217;s Patriots loss has me a little extra snarky).</p>
<p>If you can get beyond the actual release, I do think this is good news for the PR world (assuming they aren&#8217;t <a href="http://firstpersonpr.wordpress.com/2007/03/05/when-will-we-be-able-to-afford-a-social-media-release/" target="_blank">charging an arm and a leg for it</a>). I&#8217;m particularly interested in the assortment of tagging and tracking capabilities. But, as a profession, we still need to <a href="http://www.mpdailyfix.com/2007/04/six_telltale_signs_that_a_pres.html" target="_blank">work</a> on the <a href="http://www.masteryourmessage.com/wordpress/?p=53" target="_blank">quality</a> of our release <a href="http://www.webinknow.com/2006/10/the_gobbledygoo.html" target="_blank">writing</a>. Otherwise, we&#8217;re just putting lipstick &#8212; and new distribution &#8212; on a very ugly pig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2008/02/04/marketwire-saves-and-kills-the-press-release/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What wasn&#8217;t in 60 Minutes&#8217; Facebook piece</title>
		<link>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2008/01/14/what-wasnt-in-60-minutes-facebook-piece/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2008/01/14/what-wasnt-in-60-minutes-facebook-piece/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FirstPersonPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstpersonpr.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/what-wasnt-in-60-minutes-facebook-piece/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Everyone&#8217;s talking about last night&#8217;s 60 Minutes interview with Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook. I watched it and came away thinking &#8220;what a wasted, multi-million dollar PR opportunity.&#8221;
The piece started out sounding like an early Valentine for Zuckerberg, but then it turned into an uncomfortable &#8212; and sometimes painful &#8212; interview. I won&#8217;t spend much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://firstpersonpr.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/image3697348g.jpg" alt="image3697348g.jpg" align="left" /> Everyone&#8217;s talking about last night&#8217;s 60 Minutes <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/10/60minutes/main3697442.shtml?source=mostpop_story" target="_blank">interview</a> with Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook. I watched it and came away thinking &#8220;what a wasted, multi-million dollar PR opportunity.&#8221;</p>
<p>The piece started out sounding like an early Valentine for Zuckerberg, but then it turned into an uncomfortable &#8212; and sometimes painful &#8212; interview. I won&#8217;t spend much time on his actual performance &#8212; it&#8217;s safe to say that he&#8217;s in desperate need of some media training. Even Lesley Stahl interjected at one point that Zuckerberg has been described as being awkward.</p>
<p>More than his uncomfortable performance, I was really surprised that Facebook/Zuckerberg squandered such a huge opportunity. I flinched each time he was thrown an excellent transition question and he missed it. For example, here are a few key topics that he didn&#8217;t insert into the interview:</p>
<ol>
<li><i>For all it&#8217;s hype, Facebook is still the #2 social network behind MySpace. Why would I join Facebook over MySpace?</i> I&#8217;ll admit I was waiting (and hoping) for a slam about MySpace&#8217;s multiple cameos on Dateline&#8217;s &#8220;To Catch a Predator&#8221; &#8230; but they never came. I was expecting to hear Facebook&#8217;s value vis-a-vis MySpace, though.</li>
<li><i>No really, why do I want to join Facebook?</i> Early on, Lesley got excited when a former colleague reconnected with her after setting up her profile &#8212; which gave him a perfect segue to throw out a dozen other examples of people reconnecting, business people networking, or even someone finding their college sweetheart. Anything beyond Scrabble? Given the demographics of 60 Minutes&#8217; viewers, I was particularly expecting to hear a few reasons why the Gen X and Boomer generations should join. Instead, he talked about Scrabble. Now, I love the Scrabble app just as much as Zuckerberg apparently does. Unfortunately that&#8217;s about the only use I&#8217;ve found for Facebook so far, and I was waiting for him change that.</li>
<li><i>Can a 23 year old really run a $15 billion company (setting aside that it&#8217;s not actually worth that, for a moment)?</i> Lesley brought this up a few times, and Zuckerberg&#8217;s three word answers didn&#8217;t cut it. Why not point to how quickly the company is growing? Why not talk about him solidifying funding and Microsoft&#8217;s investment? Surely there could have been a FEW examples to address this. Why not point to what he&#8217;s already accomplished as CEO?</li>
<li><i>Is Zuckerberg really a visionary?</i> This one came up a few times, most notably when he was compared to the Google Gazillionaires. What a great opportunity to talk about where he sees Facebook going, how innovative the company is vs. other hot startups, etc. Yet, we got nothing.</li>
<li><i>Was all the bad publicity wrong about Beacon and Facebook&#8217;s ads?</i> With this one, Zuckerberg gave a little answer, but I don&#8217;t think &#8220;Facebook needs to pay its employees&#8221; was the right answer. I&#8217;ll grant him that it&#8217;s a legitimate reason to start monetizing Facebook&#8217;s audience, but he should have given several other, much more compelling, reasons. And then immediately followed those with an explanation about how/why the privacy concerns of Facebook users have been addressed.</li>
<li><i>Why should Facebook employees feel proud about working for him?</i> At any point, Zuckerberg could have talked about how revolutionary/innovative/etc. the company was, but he didn&#8217;t. I don&#8217;t even remember him smiling when he spoke about the team working for him.</li>
<li><i>What&#8217;s next?</i> I wasn&#8217;t expecting to hear any product news, but Zuckerberg could have thrown in a few teaser comments to keep me interested in Facebook in the coming months.</li>
</ol>
<p>As I write this, I wonder how involved Facebook&#8217;s PR team was with this opportunity. From my vantage point, either Facebook doesn&#8217;t view PR as a strategic component to the company&#8217;s success, or Zuckerberg is a classic example of a CEO who thinks he knows PR and won&#8217;t take guidance. Or, he needs a new PR team. Regardless, I think the entire Facebook team botched a huge opportunity last night that might not come his way again.</p>
<p>What did you think of the interview?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2008/01/14/what-wasnt-in-60-minutes-facebook-piece/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some thoughts from ad:tech</title>
		<link>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2007/11/08/some-thoughts-from-adtech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2007/11/08/some-thoughts-from-adtech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad:tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FirstPersonPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstpersonpr.wordpress.com/2007/11/08/some-thoughts-from-adtech/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week&#8217;s ad:tech was insane &#8230; my feet are still sore. Unfortunately, I didn&#8217;t get to sit in on a lot of sessions, but I did hit a few and got some great nuggets that relate to PR/communications:

I think I might want to (eventually) work for a consumer company. With lots of money. Several All [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s ad:tech was insane &#8230; my feet are still sore. Unfortunately, I didn&#8217;t get to sit in on a lot of sessions, but I did hit a few and got some great nuggets that relate to PR/communications:</p>
<ul>
<li>I think I might want to (eventually) work for a consumer company. With lots of money. <strike>Several</strike> All of the coolest social media case studies I heard came from consumer companies.</li>
<li>The &#8220;holy grail&#8221; of social media &#8212; whether it be social networks, blogs, video, etc. &#8212; is to move from B2B marketing/communications to C2C communications, where your brand advocates are carrying the message. This theme popped up a few times, and one attendee commented that using the &#8220;C2C&#8221; description to his execs resonated more quickly than social media did (who doesn&#8217;t love a good acronym, right?).</li>
<li>One panelist from Fox Interactive Media talked about the &#8220;momentum effect&#8221; of social media. Here are <a href="http://www.pronetadvertising.com/articles/fox-interactive-media-research-social-networks-are-a-good-advertising-platform10019.html" target="_blank">two</a> <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/04/23/social-networks-provide-momentum-effect" target="_blank">articles</a> talking about the study back in April. They&#8217;re geared toward consumers and advertising, but it includes some great stats that could be helpful selling social media internally.</li>
<li>Content continues to be king. But in the world of social media and consumer generated content (read: content overload) it needs to be more than simply relevant and interesting &#8212; it needs to add value to the community.</li>
<li>Authenticity, authenticity, authenticity.</li>
<li>And finally, don&#8217;t engage a community and then abandon them (I feel like I&#8217;ve broken this rule lately).</li>
</ul>
<p>And now, I&#8217;m off to soak the feet :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2007/11/08/some-thoughts-from-adtech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A tiny social media backfire &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2007/10/25/a-tiny-social-media-backfire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2007/10/25/a-tiny-social-media-backfire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FirstPersonPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstpersonpr.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/a-tiny-social-media-backfire/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone&#8217;s focused on the Facebook/Microsoft investment news. It&#8217;s been a topic in the rumor mill for several weeks, so it&#8217;s really not that shocking anymore. I&#8217;ve been watching the rumors and the news closely, though, because on the PR front, we all knew that at some point before the official announcement, the rumor would be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone&#8217;s focused on the Facebook/Microsoft investment news. It&#8217;s been a topic in the rumor mill for several weeks, so it&#8217;s really not that shocking anymore. I&#8217;ve been watching the rumors and the news closely, though, because on the PR front, we all knew that at some point before the official announcement, the rumor would be inadvertently confirmed (it always happens with news that big). The questions we were all asking were when and how.</p>
<p>A few news sites confirmed the rumor with &#8220;un-named&#8221; sources, but did anyone see ValleyWag&#8217;s <a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/confirmed/facebook-and-microsoft-flacks-make-friends-314647.php" target="_blank">confirmation</a> post? They happened to notice that key PR contacts at both companies had friended each other on Facebook. Clearly, ValleyWag made a (not so) huge leap of faith, but as we embrace more social technologies, this is something for us all to keep in mind: the scoop oriented media (read: bloggers) may be watching the company you keep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2007/10/25/a-tiny-social-media-backfire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transparency vs. authenticity … does one trump the other?</title>
		<link>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2007/10/22/transparency-vs-authenticity-%e2%80%a6-does-one-trump-the-other/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2007/10/22/transparency-vs-authenticity-%e2%80%a6-does-one-trump-the-other/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 02:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FirstPersonPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstpersonpr.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/transparency-vs-authenticity-%e2%80%a6-does-one-trump-the-other/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rohit Bhargava recently posted a presentation he gave about marketing in a Web 2.0 world that got me to thinking about transparency and authenticity.Let&#8217;s face it &#8211; transparency is one of the most used social media buzzwords (perhaps not too far behind conversation, blogosphere and, well, social media). It&#8217;s also a word that is both [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rohit Bhargava recently posted a <a href="http://rohitbhargava.typepad.com/weblog/2007/10/10-truths-of-ma.html" target="_blank">presentation</a> he gave about marketing in a Web 2.0 world that got me to thinking about transparency and authenticity.Let&#8217;s face it &#8211; transparency is one of the most used social media buzzwords (perhaps not too far behind conversation, blogosphere and, well, social media). It&#8217;s also a word that is both easily defined yet hard to grasp. I find this especially true when we talk about companies becoming more transparent in their communications, particularly when trying to balance the needs of the company with the requests of the online world.</p>
<p>Rohit&#8217;s presentation resonated with me because I agree &#8211; it&#8217;s not necessarily about transparency in communications, it&#8217;s about authenticity &#8211; in everything you we do.</p>
<p>If you accept that businesses are around to make money, you must also accept that there will, necessarily, be limitations on how open a company can/should be. That means that sometimes, this &#8220;transparency&#8221; isn&#8217;t always the right choice for companies &#8211; particularly when discussing future plans of the company.</p>
<p>However, I believe it is very possible for executives to be authentic while still maintaining a competitive edge and protecting proprietary information. In the end, it&#8217;s all about adding a lot more &#8220;human factor&#8221; and removing the corporate speak &#8212; which ultimately helps build trusting relationships with employees, shareholders, customers and partners, and even the media. All this is done by simply allowing a spokesperson to be honest and forthcoming (without disclosing company secrets).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstpersonpr.com/2007/10/22/transparency-vs-authenticity-%e2%80%a6-does-one-trump-the-other/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
