Corporate vs. Agency — an inside-out view 2
Today, I was struck by a major difference between working for a PR agency and doing PR inhouse — perspective.
I’ve talked about how great the camaraderie is at an agency, and it’s still something I miss. But I realized today that in-house PR folks are exposed to so many more perspectives about a company than an outsourced agency could ever be.For example, I sit next to a team of people focused on client retention. I hear their calls all day to existing customers, and get to hear some interesting conversations. Internal planning meetings typically include an interesting sampling of people across job functions who all represent different stakeholders (our customers, our technology, our investors). It’s fascinating to hear how everything affects everyone else.
At the same time, people with such varied backgrounds bring entirely new perspectives to any conversation. The questions are different, the thought processes are different, the examples of what has worked are different. I find that it brings a new level of understanding and access to the PR program that I don’t believe you can get over the phone.
I will say that I think agency PR people benefit from a different type of perspective. I loved working with multiple VPs because I found they all approached problems from a different perspective. And while the fundamental programs were relatively similar, each one offered a unique view. Mix in the ability to work on multiple clients across industries (something I craved — having completely different clients kept things interesting), and you’re presented with yet another perspective. Often, I’d brainstorm ideas and challenges with multiple people just to see their different approaches. Ultimately, looking at a problem five different ways becomes a great asset.
I’m still not ready to say one is better than the other, but more I do the more I realize just how different they are.


January 9th, 2008 at 6:30 PM
[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]
January 9th, 2008 at 10:37 PM
Oh I love it! Perspective, what a great word. You can also add “ownership.” As you know, this was a great source of frustration for me. I learned over time at the agency that while it sucks to get fired, clients leave for all kinds of reasons. We got fired when we did great work, we got fired when they thought we did terrible work. I took personal pride in owning my relationships at the agency, but at the end of the day I only had so much ownership of the project.
Further, when we made recommendations they just went into the black hole on the client side. Sometimes we did them, sometimes we never heard anything back. On the client side, early on I can recall vividly taking my idea up to the CEO and getting bombarded with a million “duh” questions that I just wasn’t prepared to answer. Right then I realized I was in a whole new ballgame, I owned the idea and the outcomes. I vowed never to be in that position again. (BTW it gets even worse with greater span of control!) I never walk an idea in, or heck, walk into ANY meeting with the CEO or senior leadership, without having run through 2 or 3 scenarios on how that meeting will go and how I will respond. Don’t win em all, but at least I am better prepared.
–Aaron
September 3rd, 2008 at 6:17 PM
[...] more time on that subject soon, because my decision to stay corporate-side ties in nicely with the corporate vs. agency [...]